Outcomes after Angiography with Sodium Bicarbonate and Acetylcysteine ( PRESERVE Trial )
May 23, 2019

Ticagrelor reversibly inhibits the platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12).1 It is approved for prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and shows evidence of superior clinical performance compared with other P2Y12 inhibitors. A post hoc analysis of the Comparison of Ticagrelor (AZD6140) and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (PLATO) trial2 revealed that patients treated with ticagrelor had a lower risk of infection-related death than those treated with clopidogrel bisulfate.3 More recently, in the Targeting Platelet-Leukocyte Aggregates in Pneumonia With Ticagrelor (XANTHIPPE) study, ticagrelor was associated with improved lung function in patients hospitalized for pneumonia.4 We therefore questioned whether ticagrelor or its metabolites could possess antimicrobial properties.

Ticagrelor and its major metabolites (M5 AR-C133913, M7, M8 AR-C124910)5 were synthetized and tested in time-kill assays against gram-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A (MRSE) (ATCC 35984); methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (ATCC 25904, ATCC 6538); glycopeptide intermediate S aureus (GISA) Mu-50 (ATCC 700699); methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) (ATCC BAA-1556); Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212); vancomycin-resistant E faecalis (VRE) (ATCC BAA-2365); and Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC 12386) and against gram-negative Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAK laboratory strain). Biofilm formation was assessed in vitro with crystal violet staining and in a mouse model of S aureus polyurethane-implant infection using Xen-29 bacteria (Perkin Elmer). Infected disks were implanted in specific pathogen-free BALB/cAnCrl mice (Charles River). The mouse protocol was approved by the ethical committee of Liège University.

Ticagrelor and AR-C124910 had bactericidal activity against all gram-positive strains tested, including drug-resistant strains GISA, MRSE, MRSA, and VRE. The minimal bactericidal concentration was 20 μg/mL against MSSA, GISA, MRSA, and VRE; 30 μg/mL against MRSE; and 40 μg/mL against E faecalis and S agalactiae. Although a dosage of 5 μg/mL delayed growth of MRSA, ticagrelor was ineffective against gram-negative strains in concentrations up to 80 μg/mL. At minimal bactericidal concentration, ticagrelor was superior to vancomycin (Figure 1A), with rapid killing of late-exponential-phase cultures of MRSA (time to kill 99.9% of the initial inoculum, 2 hours). Bactericidal activity was similar to the bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide daptomycin, recently introduced against resistant strains of S aureus (Figure 1A). A subminimal bactericidal concentration of ticagrelor (10 μg/mL) combined with vancomycin (4 μg/mL) killed approximately 50% of the initial MRSA inoculum, depicting synergistic activity. Ticagrelor also increased the bactericidal activity of rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin in a disk diffusion assay. It displayed bactericidal activity against MRSE and VRE (Figure 1B and C), with superiority over vancomycin for killing MRSE. At 24 hours, its ability to kill MRSE and VRE was similar to daptomycin (Figure 1B and C). Ticagrelor inhibited MRSA, MRSE, and VRE biofilm formation in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1D-F); biofilm mass was reduced by more than 85% after exposure to 20 μg/mL ticagrelor. Finally, in mice, conventional oral antiplatelet dosages of ticagrelor (3 mg/kg loading dose, then 1.5 mg/kg twice daily) inhibited biofilm growth on S aureus–preinfected implants and dissemination of bacteria to surrounding tissues (Figure 2).

We describe bactericidal activity of ticagrelor against antibiotic-resistant gram-positive bacteria that pose a threat to human health. Although bactericidal concentrations are not reached systemically in patients receiving typical dosages for treating cardiovascular disease (ticagrelor Cmax = 1.2 μg/mL after one 180-mg loading dose and 0.75 μg/mL at 90 mg twice daily steady state), antibacterial activity at infection sites may still be achieved through local, possibly platelet-driven, drug accumulation. Our findings provide a mechanistic explanation for the reduced infection-related death with ticagrelor seen in the PLATO trial3 and could also explain improvement in lung function in patients with pneumonia who took ticagrelor in the XANTHIPPE study.4 These findings warrant further investigations, including design of randomized clinical trials comparing the protective activity of ticagrelor against gram-positive bacterial infection in patients with cardiovascular disease with other antiplatelet drugs. We are unaware of similar findings with other P2Y12 inhibitors, and we did not observe in vitro antibacterial activity of the active metabolite of prasugrel in concentrations up to 100 μg/mL. Ticagrelor might prove superior to other P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with cardiovascular disease at risk for gram-positive bacterial infections such as infective endocarditis.6 We did not isolate mutants resistant to ticagrelor, and serial passaging of MSSA or MRSA in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of ticagrelor did not select for resistant mutants compared with ofloxacin or rifampicin, which is reassuring for long-term antiplatelet indications. There is a main limitation in this study that will be addressed in future research. The in vivo demonstration of antibacterial activity of ticagrelor antiplatelet dosages was obtained in the mouse, which differs from humans in terms of ticagrelor pharmacokinetics. Notwithstanding, our findings also encourage future investigation of potential new ticagrelor-derived antibiotics, devoid of antiplatelet activity, against multiresistant staphylococci or enterococci.

Back to top
Article Information
Accepted for Publication: March 6, 2019.

Published Online: May 8, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1189

Open Access: This article is published under the JN-OA license and is free to read on the day of publication.

Corresponding Authors: Patrizio Lancellotti, MD, PhD (plancellotti@chuliege.be), and Cécile Oury, PhD (cecile.oury@uliege.be), Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman, Batiment B35, Department of Cardiology, University of Liège Hospital, University of Liège, GIGA-Cardiovascular Sciences, CHU du Sart Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Author Contributions: Drs Lancellotti and Oury had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Lancellotti, Musumeci, Jacques, Goffin, Pirotte, Oury.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Lancellotti, Musumeci, Goffin, Pirotte, Oury.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Musumeci, Servais.

Obtained funding: Oury.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Lancellotti, Servais, Goffin, Pirotte.

Supervision: Lancellotti, Goffin, Pirotte, Oury.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Lancellotti and Oury reported a pending patent (WO2018046174A1) for a new use of triazolo (4,5-D) pyrimidine derivatives (including ticagrelor) for prevention and treatment of bacterial infection. Dr Oury is also a senior research associate at the National Funds for Scientific Research, Belgium (F.R.S.-FNRS). No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by a European Research Council-Consolidator grant (PV-COAT 647197) (Dr Lancellotti).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Springthorpe B, Bailey A, Barton P, et al. From ATP to AZD6140: the discovery of an orally active reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist for the prevention of thrombosis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17(21):6013-6018. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.07.057PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al; PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045-1057. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0904327PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Storey RF, James SK, Siegbahn A, et al. Lower mortality following pulmonary adverse events and sepsis with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in the PLATO study. Platelets. 2014;25(7):517-525. doi:10.3109/09537104.2013.842965PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Sexton TR, Zhang G, Macaulay TE, et al. Ticagrelor reduces thromboinflammatory markers in patients with pneumonia. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018;3(4):435-449. doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.05.005PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Teng R, Oliver S, Hayes MA, Butler K. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of ticagrelor in healthy subjects. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(9):1514-1521. doi:10.1124/dmd.110.032250PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135(25):e1159-e1195. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000503PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref